2022

This exact amendment was already approved in the North Tower.

The proposed BORS amendment closely mirrors the amendment successfully adopted by the North Tower in 2021 and implemented in 2022. Since then, the North Tower has experienced a noticeable improvement in quality of life and overall building condition — without any negative impact on property values.

Property values in the North Tower
were NOT reduced after the amendment
No documented investor exodus
or decline in price per square meter
Quality of life and building condition
improved measurably after adoption

Hear It Directly From The North Tower

Hear it directly from North Tower owners & realtors.

For firsthand perspectives from realtors, owners, and investors at the North Tower, you're welcome to contact us. We would be happy to arrange a call or an in-person meeting so you can hear directly about their experiences — including the absence of any negative impact on property values and the positive changes observed over the years.


Contact us at info@borsamendment.com

Contact the North Tower Management Office directly.

You may also contact or visit the North Tower Management Office to speak directly with the property manager involved in the amendment's implementation.


Phone: 305-358-5380

Email: mgonzalez@miamimanagement.com

Ask for Maritza Gonzalez

Fact

Unit values in the North Tower were not reduced after adoption.

There is no documented evidence showing that similar amendments lead to an investor exodus or a decline in price per square meter. The North Tower is the proof.

Fact

Comparable buildings have implemented this exact approach.

Including Brickell on the River North, which maintained stable property values while achieving meaningful improvements in building upkeep and resident experience.

Fiction

The amendment will drive investors away and hurt property values.

This claim has been widely circulated by the opposition — but it is not supported by any documented evidence.

Fiction

This type of amendment is untested and risky.

The opposition presents this amendment as if it were experimental or unprecedented — it is not.